ETA: Link to the trailer
I am confident that the murderer acted based on his anti-abortion beliefs (the police apparently have a suspect in custody) and this makes me wonder how he will be presented in the media. Will he be a terrorist? A Christian extremist? A mentally unstable loner? It will be interesting how this religiously motivated violence will be treated.
This is really upsetting. I never met Dr. Tiller but always admired him for not backing down in the face of threats and for believing that decisions about reproductive health should be made by women and their doctors, not religious fanatics. That is not to say that everyone opposed to abortion on religious principles is a fanatic, just those who think that their own religious beliefs should be applied to everyone. I would venture to say there are a great many people who are personally opposed to abortion but who do not support repealing Roe because they do not think they have the right to impose their religion on others. I think the president might be one of those people and that is okay with me. His comments about abortion seem to transcend the debate and engage it in a reasonable manner that do not cause him to violate his own beliefs but he also recognizes that not everyone shares them and that religious doctrine is insufficient justification for legislation in a non-theocratic state.
"We are firmly convinced the exclusion of gay and lesbian people from the institution of civil marriage does not substantially further any important governmental objective," the Supreme Court wrote.
Iowa lawmakers have "excluded a historically disfavored class of persons from a supremely important civil institution without a constitutionally sufficient justification."
To issue any other decision, the justices said, "would be an abdication of our constitutional duty."
Not only is this language emphatic support for marriage equality, the language they used in their decision is also highly significant legally. The justices overturned the ban under the equal protection clause of the Iowa State Constitution:
"In this case, we must decide if our state statute limiting civil marriage to a union between a man and a woman violates the Iowa Constitution, as the district court ruled. On our review, we hold the Iowa marriage statute violates the equal protection clause of the Iowa Constitution. Therefore, we affirm the decision of the district court." (my emphasis, for the full text of the 69 page decision, go here)
I hope that this decision also reminds the country that queers live everywhere, even the heartland, and that the midwest is often unfairly demonized in terms of progressive politics. Case in point, California, the great liberal state that passed prop 8, has a Republican governor (who, admittedly, often does not act like a Republican--but he is married to a Kennedy, after all), and regularly comes up with some of the most virulently anti-immigrant, English-only racist bullshit propositions that sometimes get passed. And we have a lot of Minutemen running around. Iowa (and Kansas, actually) both have strong progressive histories that sometimes get obscured by the nature of national political debates. I am not by any stretch attempting to claim that they are not also Bible belt states with serious right-wing conservative populations, too, but they are not just that. In fact, San Diego is considerably more conservative than the two midwestern places I spent most of my time. Kansas City, MO is a pretty liberal, metropolitan city that has, for as long as I have lived, always had a Democratic mayor and city council, has a strong, vibrant queer community, and, even though race relations have always been difficult, a strong and active civil rights community. Lawrence, KS is also a haven of liberal joy in the Bible Belt. Granted, that is largely because of the presence of KU but as UCSD students regularly remind me, universities are not by default liberal places and there are plenty of super-conservative fundamentalist Christians running around UCSD (I mean, seriously a whole lot). I think some of my students would be happy to live in an aristocracy with no voting rights for the middle class or lower. Lawrence was one of the first places in the country to add sexual orientation AND gender identity as protected statuses in the city charter.
The Onion had a funny story about Obama being depressed and distant after the series finale of Battlestar Galactica. Really funny stuff. SPOILER WARNING: If you have not wached the last few episodes, do not read the article yet.
And, in other news, the Economist magazine posted a story about their plans to open a theme park called Econoland. My impression is that this is an April Fool's joke but I really wish it were true. I would love to go to a theme park that mixes fun, thrilling rides with "the excitement of macroeconomics". They really went all out on this, making an interactive map and everything. It reminds me of a funny joke one of my economics professors at KU used to like to tell (she is a microeconomist--does labor economics):
How can you tell a macroeconomist has a sense of humor?
They use decimal points.
That is funny shit, people.
(I heard the quote on NPR while I was in the car and cannot find it on the interweb...if I track it down soon, I will post a link to an article with the quote)
Seymour Hersh, the super-amazing investigative journalist, was on Fresh Air today talking about peace in the Middle East and Syria, Iran, and the US, as well as some nefarious Bush administration stuff. He mentioned one that I was completely unfamiliar with, Dick Cheney's kill squad. Apparently, Dick Cheney, the former vice president (an office that has no command authority over the military), had a sweet, off the books deal going with the Joint Special Operations Command (http://www.socom.mil/#) in which he was the only approval required for the assassination of high level targets around the world. Congress is actually supposed to be involved in those decisions, particularly the Defense Sub-Committee, which has like 4 people on it so they are the most top secret committee in the legislative branch.
I really like the idea of congressional oversight of the executive branch and missed it a great deal during the Bush years. I hope Obama brings it back. Hersh has a new book coming out soon about this but more can be found at these fine places:
The Raw Story
Fresh Air interview with Terry Gross (mostly about Syria but very interesting and mentions the kill squad)
What the Defense Department has to say
Seymour Hersh at the New Yorker
I am not so naive as to believe that our government does not kill people in a secretive and rather scary manner but I think that some oversight is probably a good idea. The whole idea of assassination does not sit well with me but I will probably have to think about this issue more. Is it better to send one highly trained soldier or CIA agent to kill some really scary guy up close and personal than a guided missile that takes out innocent civilians? I think maybe so. I mean, avoiding killing people is way preferable but given that it is going to occur, which is better? But then we have to ask who makes the decision about who is an important enough scary guy. Apparently Dick Cheney. No matter what conclusion I come to, whether these things are ever justifiable or not, I am definitely sure Dick Cheney should not be making the decision. He is a scary guy.
"We have accepted that this is a co-responsibility," she said. "We know very well that the drug traffickers are motivated by the demand for illegal drugs in the United States, that they are armed by the transport of weapons from the United States to Mexico, and therefore we see this as a responsibility to assist the Mexican government and people in defeating an enemy that is committing violence and disruption that is very harmful."
Now, as anyone who has ever taken an economics course knows, if the people want something, someone will find a way to produce it. How is it that in every other facet of the economy our government seems to get this, yet with the drug trade, we blame the suppliers? We use the military to execute police actions through Latin America, Afghanistan, and other major drug producing countries, spraying toxic pesticides over agricultural land that poisons subsistence crops and ground water, as well as some drug crops. Who recovers from that faster--drug suppliers or independent farmers? We spend billions more on the war on drugs in other countries without taking serious steps to curb demand.
Sure, we spend a lot of money on police actions in this country that are aimed at poor and minority communities, criminalizing drugs and filling prisons with small time users and low level street dealers that are essentially replaced within a few hours. But hasn't anyone noticed that that has not yet worked? If people want it, someone will sell it. In order to stop the drug trade, we need to stop the demand for drugs. I generally think some drugs ought to just be legalized so they can be heavily regulated and that instead of criminalizing drug use, we should approach it as a public health issue. No US policy has started to get to the heart of demand for drugs, approaching it as a public health crisis, and until it does, I think we are just throwing money away, building more resentment against the US, and certainly not helping anyone kick a habit.
So, I am glad that Clinton admitted American culpability (complicity?) in the global drug trade. And she mentioned the guns. Lots of guns go over that border. I don't even want to get started on the violence. 843 people were killed in drug-related violence in Tijuana last year, over 5300 across Mexico. There has been a drug war waging just 30 minutes south of here for the last year. One of our neighbors moved up here a while ago to escape the violence. Their 13-year-old son was almost kidnapped (which happens all the time) so they dropped everything and were out of TJ in a few hours. So, I am really glad that the Obama administration is being straightforward about this. Hopefully, it will amount to more than just an awesome soundbite.
Okay, the "enemy" language bothered me a little. But I think that is just the rhetoric of our age.
Rules:
* Grab the book nearest you (the NEAREST, not your favorite book, the coolest, or the most intellectual).
* Turn to page 56.
* Find the fifth full sentence.
* Post that sentence along with these instructions in your LJ.
"This, I do assure you, is what my god commands; and it is my belief that no greater good has ever befallen you in this city than my service to my god; for I spend all my time going about trying to peruade you, young and old, to make your first and chief concern not for your bodies or for your possessions, but for the highest welfare of your souls, proclaiming as I go, 'Wealth does not bring goodness, but goodness brings wealth and every other blessing, both to the individual and to the State.'"
I am not sure if I am supposed to post the name of the book. Any guesses?
- Pound for pound, beef production generates greenhouse gases that contribute more than 13 times as much to global warming as do the gases emitted from producing chicken. For potatoes, the multiplier is 57.
- Beef consumption is rising rapidly, both as population increases and as people eat more meat.
- Producing the annual beef diet of the average American emits as much greenhouse gas as a car driven more than 1,800 miles.
These data came out a few months ago when the UNFAO report was first published but SciAm does a nice job summarizing it. I think it is pretty cool that they compare the environmental costs of beef to other meats, as well as vegetables (okay, they only mention Peruvian grown asparagus). For people who do not think much about the animal cruelty issues associated with factory farming, I think this is probably a pretty good argument for being a vegetarian in the industrialized world or at least making a concerted effort to learn where your food comes from and how it gets to you. I think it is pretty interesting how global economic and political inequalities are manifest in virtually everything we do from the cars we drive to the food we eat.
I originally became a vegetarian when I was 12 after raising some orphaned chicks and realizing I did not feel comfortable eating my friends and realized that if they could become my friends, any chickens probably could, too. While that rather simplistic view remains the core of why I am a vegetarian, ecological and geo-political reasons have gotten added on top since then. The global meat industry produces more greenhouse gases than private car driving. That is a pretty big piece of knowledge.
I love spy shows (Alias, for example) and the idea of spies but the reality has always rubbed my card-carrying Democratic Socialist self the wrong way. But it turns out that these folks are really articulate, well-educated people who actually had an idea about what would happen in Iraq if the US invaded, who knew that Saddam had nothing to do with the Taliban or Al Qaeda, and who think that torture is stupid.
Peter Earnest, the host, is a former CIA officer and does a great job with the interviews. He interviewed people involved with the Iran hostage crisis, Cold War defections from the USSR, several Middle Eastern specialists, Valerie Plame (that was awesome), and Masters of Disguise and the tech people. The disguise and tech interviews were really neat. Shoe phones! Oh, that was Get Smart!
He did an interview with a guy who was the CIA's top polygraph guy about why it is an art and a science. Many of the interviews have been with women involved with the CIA and how women's roles have changed and how women are just as good at being spies, or better, than men. I still certainly have issues with American intelligence, of course, but I think I have to take a more nuanced and comlex view that recognizes some of these folks are really doing the right thing. Weird. They all talk about service and patriotism are clearly dedicated to serving as patriots. I have to re-think what these terms mean. Anything that makes me think twice about assumptions I make is tops in my book. Not that I am all YAY about it but it has definitely problematized things for me. I thought I was over "problematized", stupid grad school.
If you are interested in spy things, even just in a science fiction/Jennifer Garner rocks way, I recommend this podcast. Very exciting and interesting opinions about major international events. Stalin's daughter defected! Through India! Good interview. I would like to go to the Spy Museum.
In the fall I taught two classes at a community college because the schedule would have allowed me to spend most of my time at the park with the bonobos doing research without giving up gainful employment. So I was not on campus at UCSD much and I also did not have an opportunity to TA in MMW, the program I have worked in for 4 years. This meant that I did not do any of the things I usually did. Anyone who has attended school, which is pretty much most folks, knows that the pattern of school fall through spring, summers off, start again, is something that becomes a deeply ingrained way of life. Add to that the fact that I have been in school near continuously (save for a semester or year here and there when I dropped out or was finding myself) for 26 years and that I am a person who relies heavily on predictability and likes my life to be organized (some might call this obsessive compulsive or anal), and you may have some understanding of what a break in my routine does. In fact, I am so wedded to my routine that even when I have a day off and do not need to be up early in the morning, I still like to get up by 7 or 7:30. Saturdays, Sundays, holidays, whatever--Iike getting up early. This is, of course, heavily influenced by the 45-pound Australian shepherd-border collie-beagle-spaniel who is also wedded to her routine and would like her walk at around the same time every morning, thank you very much, and is rather persistent in reminding me of this. In a really adorable kind of way. Back to the break in routine...
Not TAing in MMW, not sitting at my desk in the office, not seeing any of my school friends (which would have been challenging, anyway, since one was in Iceland, one was in Israel, and the other one now works in another office on campus and sometimes is not in the hallway), and not going to the coffee cart profoundly affected the way I did things. I was still happy and thoroughly enjoyed my teaching, as well as the opportunity to work at home more, but it was strange. Now? All is right with the universe again. Minor caveat: dissertation being on hold is a little challenging emotionally but the decision not to freak out has made a big difference. Plus, financially speaking, this works out well. I can spend this time earning and saving since my teaching load is gigantic right now, and I can focus on applying for grants without trying to do research at the same time. Not that I expect to get any of them (NSF already came back in the negatory) but whatever. Universe=way it ought to be.
So, I am back in MMW. I love MMW. It is a ton of work, eats up tons of my time (and would eat small pieces of my soul if I believed in such things as souls), and I am teaching 3 sections instead of the usual 2 which just means everything is extra. I am also teaching for a new professor. He is not new in the sense of having recently become a professor or joined MMW, he is simply new to me. For the last 3 years I have TA'd for the same professor for MMW2, including 2 summers, so this is an entirely new experience. But, this new professor? Totally awesome and hilarious. He is a really great lecturer, very funny and dynamic. Last night I had my first sections where we actually went over course material and they were wonderful. My students were so involved and engaged. They asked questions, shouted out answers, and really seemed to be getting into. Teaching three classes in a row is pretty challenging and takes a lot of energy but I felt so great when we finished. Plus, we were talking about the Babylonian Epic of Creation which is one of my favorite stories and I love the way they read the creation stories in Genesis after having read it. So, MMW? Excellent.
I also get to sit in the office and work. Or at least pretend to work while chatting with everyone, which is way better. Plus we had tacos for dinner last night.
This is a list of the top ten (in no particular order) reasons Joss Whedon is an Evil Bastard Man.
( Cut for spoilers for everything Joss Whedon has done... )
Go watch this video now.
Prop 8 Musical
Funniest.Thing.Ever. I love musicals and Neil Patrick Harris. And Margaret Cho. And Allison Janey. And John C. Riley. And all of those other people whose names I am not putting here.
I feel dramatically better today than I have previously. But while I was ill, I managed to read all 4 volumes of DC's 52 (which I enjoyed, particularly the Montoya/Question storyline and particularly not Booster Gold who is stupid-and-a-half and why are so many authors so dumb about Wonder Woman?), two Batgirl (Cass) trades (I love her interactions with Barbara--is there any one else who needs to get out and have fun more than Babs except Cassie?), Infinite Crisis and its Companion (which I read mostly so that 52 would make sense and really just got more confused...and where the hell was Black Canary in the whole freaking thing? and why are so many authors so dumb about Wonder Woman?), watched season 1 of Alias, lamented the fact that it is the only season of Alias I own, watched the gag reel from Alias and loved Jennifer Garner all over again, watched half of season 5 of Stargate SG-1, and GOT ABSOLUTELY NO REAL WORK DONE UNTIL T
The moral of the story? Get a flu shot. Every year I have gotten a flu shot ,I have not gotten sick. Every year I have not gotten a flu shot, I have gotten bronchitis. The secondary moral of the story? If you do not get a flu shot, make sure you have a lot of comic books to catch up on and more than the first season of Alias.
Okay, now I have to work again.
We started out in Balboa Park at 10:45ish, walked down 6th Avenue to Broadway then Broadway to Pacific Highway to end at the County Administrative Building. It was about 3 miles although at the snail's pace we were going it seemed much longer. We started out in the middle but walked along the sidewalk for long time so we ended up near the front. When we got close to downtown we turned around and looked behind us and could not see the end of the marchers. All the way up 6th Avenue was just a sea of people. It was pretty cool. There were 5 counter protesters and one of them was apparently there to film the marchers looking for illegal immigrants. He was wearing anti-immigrant slogans on his clothing and hard hat. Yes, he was wearing a hard hat. He was later arrested.
It was pretty fun.

tired
sick